Nevada Ed-Watch 10/23/20

The Ed-Watch series is designed to increase access to information on what decisions are being made regarding public education in Clark County and Nevada.


Clark County School District Board of Trustees 

What is the Board of Trustees & what are they responsible for? The CCSD Trustees are publicly elected decision-makers for the school district. They are responsible for providing oversight to the Superintendent and establishing District-wide policy. Trustees are accountable to work with their communities to improve student achievement.

Click here to learn more and see a list of current Trustees

Click here to find your Trustee District

How often does the Board of Trustees meet? Trustees meet twice per month (second and fourth Thursdays) at 5pm at the Edward A. Greer Education Center (Board Room): 2832 E. Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89121.

Click here for a full list of Trustees meetings and agendas

Click here to visit Hope For Nevada’s #NVEd Calendar

Can community members engage at Trustee Meetings? Decision-making bodies benefit greatly from hearing public input and multiple perspectives. Community members can sign up to speak after the agenda has been posted– by calling the Board Office at (702) 799-1072 at least 3 hours before the scheduled meeting, or signing up in-person at the beginning of the meeting. Prior to each agenda item being voted on, speakers can share their perspective after the Board’s discussion and prior to the vote.


Thursday, October 22, 2020

Clark County School District Board of Trustees Meeting

Click here to see the meeting agenda

What happened at this meeting?

Public Comment

Members of the public submitted comments online. Public comment was not read directly into the record, and rather an oral summary of each comment was provided to Trustees.

  • Click here & here to view public comment submitted on agenda items.
  • Click here to view public comment submitted on non-agenda items.

Trustees Approved Consent Agenda 

Highlights:

  • Purchase awards totalling $1.1 million, including $580,000 for medical equipment and furniture for students with disabilities. 
  • Contract with Rethink Ed for a web-based package of supports for students on the Autism Spectrum.

Trustees Discussed Agreement for School Psychologist Contractors

The 5-year agreement with Jackson Therapy Partners, LLC provides for a limited number of school psychologist contractors to be placed in schools when the district is unable to recruit and directly hire individuals to fill school psychologist vacancies. Trustees discussed the need for a long-term strategy to strengthen the school-based mental health professional pipeline and improve working conditions for CCSD school psychologists. This item will come back before the board in November.

Click here to see the reference material

Trustees Approved Scholarship Funds 

The Susan Brager Occupational Education Scholarship provides $1,000 for an eligible CCSD high school senior engaged at least two years of occupational education. The scholarship is administered annually through the Public Education Foundation

Trustees Approved Contract with Applied Analysis

State law authorizes the Board of Trustees to issue general obligation bonds for the construction, design or purchase of new school buildings, remodeling and repairing existing buildings and ground, and acquiring sites for building schools. Trustees approved a contract with Applied Analysis, an economic and policy research analysis firm, to develop a legislative strategy that extends the district’s bonding authority for at least 10 additional years. 

Click here to see the reference materials 
Click here to see the contract

Trustees Provided Input on School Reopening 

Trustees heard a presentation on the COVID-19 positivity rates from Dr. Fermin Leguen, Acting Director of the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD). Dr. Leguen shared that it is unlikely that metrics originally set to signal the safe reopening of CCSD schools will meet acceptable levels for reopening in the near future. Based on this, along with consideration of the impact of distance education on student learning, mental health, and community stability, Dr. Leguen shared that SNHD would be supportive of CCSD reopening under a hybrid-model with continued implementation of mitigation strategies such as mask-wearing and social distancing. Trustees expressed concerns about the safety of students and staff upon reopening with high positivity rates in the County. There is no current timeline for CCSD schools to reopen in-person.

Trustees also provided considerations for the district’s reopening plan, to be presented to Trustees at the November 12 meeting. Suggestions included: 

  • Prioritize in-person learning for young students, students with highest needs, and those least successful in distance learning 
  • Limit interaction between groups of students and adults 
  • Ensure employees have the option to continue to work from home 
  • Create an audit and monitoring system for ventilation improvements at school sites 
  • Create a comprehensive communication plan that outlines mitigation strategies and prepares the public in advance for the pivot to in-person school
  • Convene mental health professionals and experts within the district to identify social-emotional support strategies

This was not an action item. 

Click here to see the presentation

Click here to read about this in the Las Vegas Review-Journal


Sign up to receive a notification when a new Ed-Watch post is published:

Nevada Ed-Watch 10/08/2020

The Ed-Watch series is designed to increase access to information on what decisions are being made regarding public education in Clark County and Nevada.


Clark County School District Board of Trustees 

What is the Board of Trustees & what are they responsible for? The CCSD Trustees are publicly elected decision-makers for the school district. They are responsible for providing oversight to the Superintendent and establishing District-wide policy. Trustees are accountable to work with their communities to improve student achievement.

Click here to learn more and see a list of current Trustees

Click here to find your Trustee District

How often does the Board of Trustees meet? Trustees meet twice per month (second and fourth Thursdays) at 5pm at the Edward A. Greer Education Center (Board Room): 2832 E. Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV 89121.

Click here for a full list of Trustees meetings and agendas

Click here to visit Hope For Nevada’s #NVEd Calendar

Can community members engage at Trustee Meetings? Decision-making bodies benefit greatly from hearing public input and multiple perspectives. Community members can sign up to speak after the agenda has been posted– by calling the Board Office at (702) 799-1072 at least 3 hours before the scheduled meeting, or signing up in-person at the beginning of the meeting. Prior to each agenda item being voted on, speakers can share their perspective after the Board’s discussion and prior to the vote.


Thursday, October 8, 2020

Clark County School District Board of Trustees Meeting

Click here to see the meeting agenda

What happened at this meeting?

Public Comment

Members of the public submitted comments online. Public comment was not read directly into the record, and rather an oral summary of each comment was provided to Trustees.

  • Click here to view public comment submitted on agenda items.
  • Click here and here to view public comment submitted on non-agenda items.

Trustees Approved Consent Agenda 

Highlights:

  • Amendment of the Interlocal Contract to allow CCSD to bill for the maximum amount of services allowed in the newly expanded School Health Services program
  • Approval of purchase awards totaling nearly $3 million, including $1 million for K-12 reading programs and $350,000 for school ventilation equipment
  • Approval to enter into a professional services agreement for test and balance services in support of an unnamed elementary school
  • Approval of CCSD Regulation and Policy updates outlined at the September 10th Board meeting

Trustees Approved Title IX Resolution 

At the September 10th board meeting, Trustees voted to postpone the vote on the Title IX Resolution over Trustees’ concerns with the implications of the changes. At the request of one of the Trustees, language has been added in the second resolution which now requires the Board of Trustees to approve policy to implement Title IX regulations and includes policies based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  

The resolution does not change any regulations; rather, the resolution states the District’s compliance with federal law and the Board fulfillment of all requirements with the exception of amending or modifying the regulations in due time.

Click here to read the resolution.

Trustees Heard Update on the CCSD’s COVID-19 Response

Health Information: The Board heard a presentation on the COVID-19 response from Dr. Fermin Leguen, Acting Director of the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD). Dr. Leguen outlined the factors SNHD is tracking with regards to opening schools, based on CDC recommendations and guidance. Along with the COVID-19 positivity rate for CCSD students and staff, factors include the 14-day community infection rate. As of October 1, 2020, the Clark County community transmission rate indicates higher risk of transmission in schools.

Between September 27 to October 1, 172 children in Clark Country between the ages of 0-17 years have been diagnosed with COVID-19. SNHD is considering the implications of this data as it relates to sending children back to school in close contact.

Following Emergency Directive 033, which adjusts the limitation on public gatherings from 50 to 250 people (or 50% of occupancy, whichever is less), SNHD will continue to monitor the behavior of COVID-19 and its potential to impact transmission in schools. At this time, there is no recommendation for schools to reopen.

Task Force Initiative for Educators’ Safety and Screening: CCSD staff will have access to free COVID-19 testing through the Task Force for Educator’s Safety & Screening (TIES) program. CCSD General Council is considering a contract with emocha Health to monitor TIES. Following concerns Trustees expressed at the September 24 board meeting with regard to requiring employees to get tested and the implications on confidentiality, the TIES program will be provided on a voluntary basis for participating staff. Staff would also be required to complete the ongoing CCSD required health checks while they are on campus. Student testing was not discussed.

Mental Health: Trustees heard a presentation on the mental health supports in place by CCSD personnel, mental health data points, the complexities of dealing with mental health through the supports, and the need to be agile to prepare for a scenario where distance education continues for a longer period of time. 

  • CCSD personnel involved in mental health supports:
    • Wraparound Services: CCSD has a total of 254 social workers–100 full-time CCSD staff and 154 contracted social workers through Progressus. The ratio of CCSD social workers is 1 to 1,174 students.
    • Guidance & Counseling: The ratio of counselors is 1 to 400 high school students, 1 to 500 middle school students, and 1 to 640 elementary school students.
    • Psychological Services: There is 1 psychologist to 1,850 students; the national recommendation is 1 to 700. 
    • Health Services: School nurses are part of the teams at school sites involved in suicide ideation and supports.
  • Data Points: Trustees heard data on a number of mental health areas, including: 
    • Specialized Instructional Support Personnel (SISP) referrals increased from 10,667 in August/September 2019 to 15,641 in August/September 2020.
    • CCSD experienced decreases in Department of Family Services (DFS) submissions by staff and community members.
    • Student suicide ideation reports decreased, potentially due to a lack of face-to-face contact with psychologists and counselors that would normally lead to ideation reports.
    • From June 2020 to October 1, 2020, CCSD police made 81 home visits in response to suicide ideations.
    • CCSD safe school professionals, social workers, and mental health professionals conducted 23,825 wellness checks
  • Supports for CCSD staff: CCSD staff engaged with social-emotional professional learning via Canvas in August, which included Trauma 101 professional learning, suicide protocol training, and self-care for educators. Virtual webinars will soon be made available to support CCSD staff on subjects such as coping with anxiety during COVID-19. CCSD staff will continue to have access to the Life Connection Employee Assistance Program, provided through Behavioral Healthcare Options.
  • Student Enrollment & Attendance: 
    • Funded enrollment: As of October 1, enrollment is down 4% (or 12,622 students) from prior year. According to CCSD, the majority of the decline can be attributed to the White/Caucasian student population, which was down 7,222 students (or 9.5%) from prior year. Pre-K through 3rd grade enrollment is down 8,167 students (or 8.5%) from prior year.
    • Withdrawals from the district: Compared to the prior year, private school withdrawals are up over 1,000 and charter school withdrawals are up over 2,000. Homeschool withdrawals are up approximately 2,000 from prior year. 
    • Intent to homeschool: Intents to Homeschool were submitted for 2,122 CCSD students as of September 16.
    • For the week ending September 18, overall attendance was 90.6% as compared to 94.8% during the comparable 4th week of instruction in the prior year.

Lesson Learned: Trustees heard a presentation on lessons learned from current instructional models and telecommuting responsibilities by other school systems and districts.  In a review of 10 representative sample districts, seven are currently operating with full-time distance education, three are currently in transition to a hybrid model, and none currently reporting a full-time face-to-face for the majority of their students.

In a number of districts with plans to transition from full-time distance to hybrid models in January 2021, supervisors will have the discretion to direct staff to return to work locations. Other districts may consider requiring staff to return to work locations to deliver online instruction even though students will not be present. Districts will revisit employee-work expectations prior to transitioning to hybrid models.

Staff Transition to Face-to-Face Instruction Questionnaire: 

Last week, CCSD conducted a survey to find out how CCSD school staff feel about returning to work. Responses were received from approximately 80% of CCSD school staff.

Survey results:

  • 55% said ‘Yes’ when asked if they were planning to return to work locations if the option to telecommute in a hybrid or full-time model remains available.
  • 17% indicated that they would return to work locations only if the District resumes within the full-time face-to-face model.
  • 28% indicated that they did not want to return to work. 

The Board interprets this data as the staff’s desire to continue to telecommute due to concerns around community health data or a number of staff members with young children at home who would not have supervision. CCSD will need the majority of staff to return to work to implement a hybrid or full-time face-to-face model.

Click here to see the presentation.
Click here to see supplemental student enrollment and attendance data.

Click here to read about this in the Las Vegas Review-Journal.


Sign up to receive a notification when a new Ed-Watch post is published:

Nevada Ed-Watch 10/8/20

The Ed-Watch series is designed to increase access to information on decisions being made regarding public education in Clark County and Nevada.


Nevada State Board of Education

What is the State Board of Education & what are they responsible for? The Nevada State Board of Education adopts regulations based on Nevada laws, which are passed down to individual school districts in Nevada to implement. The Board has 11 total (7 appointed and 4 publicly elected) members.

How often does the State Board meet? The Nevada State Board of Education meets once per month on Thursdays at 9:00AM. Click here to see the 2020 Board Meeting Schedule. Click here to visit Hope For Nevada’s #NVEd Calendar.

Can community members engage at State Board Meetings? A time for public comment is provided at the beginning (for agenda items) and at the conclusion (on any matter) of each Board meeting. There is a time limit of three minutes per speaker. Members of the community providing testimony must fill out a visitor card, available on-site the day of the meeting.

Click here for a list of all State Board Members.


Thursday, October 8, 2020
Nevada State Board of Education Meeting

Click here to see the meeting agenda

What happened at this meeting?

Public Comment

Members of the public provided testimony regarding: 

  • Concerns about inequitable distance learning workloads for students across the state 
  • Concerns about the ongoing implementation of the Reorganization of the Clark County School District
  • Concerns that proposed Nevada Academic Content Standards for health education do not comply with Nevada law
  • Concerns over support of AJR 1 to increase mining tax to generate new revenue for Nevada that could be directed to education
  • Concerns over significant drop in enrollment of English Language Learners (ELLs) and school districts’ identification of ELL students

President’s Report

  • Vice President Newburn congratulated Juliana Urturbey as the 2021 Nevada Teacher of the Year. As a National Board Certified Teacher serving fourth and fifth grade special education students at Kermit R. Booker Elementary, Juliana Urturbey will move on to represent Nevada in the national Teacher of the Year competition. 

Superintendent’s Report

State Superintendent Ebert report highlights:

  • Response to COVID-19:
    • Connectivity: The Connecting Kids Nevada initiative has reported that 12 of 17 school districts have a 1:1 ratio of students to devices and will continue to identify students with technology needs.
    • Praxis: Due to COVID-19 closures, new educators completed the Praxis exam online. 
    • PPE: Governor Sisolak has allocated $6 million towards personal protective equipment (PPE) for school districts. 
    • Assessments: The United States Department of Education has directed states to administer student assessments for the 2020-2021 school year. The Nevada Department of Education is requesting flexibility around the administration of student assessments in the spring.  
  • Quality Rating Improvement System (QRIS): The QRIS is the system used by the Nevada Department department of education to rate early childhood education centers. In 2019-2020, 51.5% of early childhood education centers were rated as “quality”.  Click here to read the QRIS report. 
  • READ Nevada: The READ Nevada program provides age-appropriate digital books and articles to support literacy for Nevada students. Over the summer, students engaged in 3 million minutes of reading using the READ Nevada program. Click here to see the presentation 
  • Grants: The Department has been awarded $10 million dollars from the U.S. Department of Education to support the pipeline and capacity building for school based mental health providers including school psychologists, school counselors, and school social workers. 

Board Heard Update on School Reopening Implementation 

Superintendents of three school districts and a representative of the Nevada Parent Teacher Association each provided updates to the Board on the implementation of school reopening. 

  • Douglas County School District (DCSD): 
    • All DCSD elementary schools and one high school have fully reopened while all middle schools and one high school have implemented hybrid learning. The district has also developed a new online school.  
    • All 5,426 students have needed devices and 99% of students are connected to the internet.
    • DCSD has a team of counselors, social workers, and resource officers to meet social-emotional needs of students. 

Click here to see the Douglas County Presentation 

  • Eureka County School District (ECSD):
    • ECSD schools resumed in-person instruction for all schools on August 31, 2020, following health and safety protocols. Four students continue to utilize distance learning. Enrollment data shows that 8 percent of ECSD students exited the district to engage in private school or homeschooling.
    • ECSD received $16,000 in state funding to restock personal protective equipment (PPE) and other cleaning supplies. 
    • Distance education proved significant connectivity challenges for Eureka County due to antiquated broadband infrastructure. 

Click here to see the Eureka County Presentation. 

  • Lander County School District (LCSD):
    • Schools have opened using hybrid learning and in-person instruction with alternating days. 
    • LCSD purchased 460 chromebooks, with several not arriving until March, and over 40 ‘MiFi’ units which allow families eligible for free-or-reduced price lunch to receive free internet access. 
    • LCSD has a counselor or social worker in every school to support the social-emotional needs of the school communities. 
    • Challenges brought by the coronavirus outbreak has halted the district’s recruitment and some educators had to leave the profession for the sake of safety. 

Click here to see the Lander County presentation. 

  • Nevada Parent Teacher Association (PTA):
    • Family and student experience varies widely and is largely shaped at the classroom and school level. The COVID-19 outbreak has exacerbated several underlying conditions at school and at home. 
    • Nevada PTA received positive response from parents regarding food distribution sites, increased family-teacher communication and involvement, and online and blended learning methods. 
    • Parents and children continue to face challenges with distance learning, especially in special and early childhood education. Social-emotional support, accessing enrollment, and accessing adequate devices and internet for online learning are ongoing challenges.  Parents are continuing to seek out school and community resources for assistance. 

Click here to see the Nevada PTA presentation. 

Board Heard an Update from English Mastery Council 

Members of the English Mastery Council (EMC) provided an update on the status of their work as well as draft recommendations to the board for improving supports and services for students learning English as a second language in Nevada. Highlights include: 

  • Identifying evidence-based practices to support students learning English,
  • analyzing the efficacy of the English Language Acquisition and Development (ELAD) endorsement, and 
  • root cause analysis to identify gaps in supports for English Language Learners 

Additionally, the EMC brought forth 5 recommendations for discussion by the board. These recommendations will come back before the board at a future date for approval: 

  1. Require all school districts to create a detailed EL plan to implement their EL policy. All districts are required to develop a district EL policy as per NRS 388.407
  2. Require school district EL plans to specify ELD curriculum materials and instructional methods that support language development and provide high-quality instruction that align with: – Nevada Academic Content Standards – District identified Models of Instruction/Instructional Delivery methods – Nevada ELD Standards
  3. Ensure that school districts properly and accurately identify EL students to avoid: – Over-identification of ELs who qualify for Special Education – Under-identification of ELs who qualify for Gifted & Talented (GATE) and other advanced programs 
  4. Ensure that educators have access to quality professional learning opportunities to enhance capacity to understand and use curriculum, assessment measures, and instructional strategies that support academic language development and equitable access to grade level academic content
  5. Ensure that school districts establish procedures and regular opportunities for parents of ELs to provide feedback and recommendations on EL programs and services

Click here to see the presentation and recommendations. 

Board Approved Consent Agenda

Consent agenda highlights:

Board Discussed Washoe County School District Work-Based Learning Plan 

The Work-Based Learning Plan outlines the requirements for credit-bearing internship programs available to Washoe County School District students.  Board members raised concern about student expectations within the work-based learning plan that could create potential access barriers. The board did not vote on this item, and has directed the district to revisit the plan and address any requirements that may prevent equitable access to work-based learning programs.  Some identified barriers included requirements for students to have access to transportation, daily access to email/internet, and limited behavior incidents. 

Click here to see the plan. 

Board Approved 2020 Nevada Academic Content Standards for Health 

Nevada Academic Content Standards (NVACS) are measurable standards of what students are expected to know and do by the end of each school year. Compared to the current NVACS for Health, adopted in 2007, the 2020 proposed NVACS also meet elementary grade level standards, align to the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS), recognize diversity, and require a rationale statement for content standards and strands. The new strands are adjusted to be inclusive, comprehensive, and overarching. Board members expressed concerns over ensuring that the standards are fully in compliance with the law as well as the intent. NDE staff will return to the board with updates regarding compliance. 

Click here to view the presentation and here to view the proposed NVACS.

Board Heard Update on Commission on School Funding

In follow up to discussion at the August 27 Board Meeting, board members heard an update from the Commission on School Funding and a recommendation to the board to adopt a definition for the “at-risk” weight within the Pupil Centered Funding Formula.  Based on legislation, “at-risk” may be defined as students eligible for free or reduced lunch, or an alternative definition may be adopted. 

The recommendation brought to the board is to define “at-risk” as increased probability of a student not persisting to graduation with their cohort, and expand to include based on attendance, behavior, academic success, stability, and GRAD scores. 

The board expressed concerns over the variables included in the definition as presented, mechanism to measure variables included in the definition, and preventing misinformation. 

The board did not move forward with a vote on the “at-risk” definition and requested the Commission modify the expanded definition offered in the recommendation. 

Click here to view the presentation. 

Board Heard Update on the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Workgroup 

The purpose of the workgroup is to address systemic racism in Nevada’s education system that affects students of color, including components such as teacher diversity, discipline practices, and access to technology. 

The workgroup reviewed a report on the implementation of restorative justice including the state of implementation, training, and relevant data that outlined a disproportionate number of children of color punished by disciplinary action. 

Click here to view the presentation. 

Board Heard Update on Nevada Accountability Portal

In accordance with the U.S. Department of Education waiver in response to COVID-19 school building closures, assessment requirements for the 2019-2020 school year were waived. This means that no new NSPF data will be provided to the public, and therefore Star Ratings, and the NSPF data that make up Star Ratings, will carry over from the 2018-2019 school year. Several areas of data were not captured and will not be reported in the Nevada Accountability portal for 2020-2021. New changes to the Nevada Accountability portal includes Per Pupil Expenditures, Professional Qualifications of Educators, and disaggregated discipline data. Reporting enhancement also includes a tool to compare schools’ key accountability data. 

Click here to view the presentation. 

Requests for Future Agenda items 

  • Presentation on comparison of Fall 2020 student performance projections and outcomes
  • Presentation from students on their perspective on school instruction in the time of COVID-19

Sign up to receive a notification when a new Ed-Watch post is published:

Nevada Ed-Watch 10/2/20

The Ed-Watch series is designed to increase access to information on what decisions are being made regarding public education in Clark County and Nevada.


State Public Charter School Authority (SPCSA)

What is the SPCSA & what are they responsible for? The SPCSA sponsors and oversees public charter schools across the State of Nevada. The Authority consists of nine appointed members responsible for overseeing educational and operational standards, and holding sponsored schools accountable to the academic achievement of students.

How often does the SPCSA Board meet? SPCSA members meet once monthly– on Fridays.

Click here for SPCSA meeting schedule and materials.

Can community members engage at SPCSA Board Meetings? All meetings are held publicly at the Nevada Department of Education building in Carson City and the Nevada Department of Education building in Las Vegas (1st floor boardroom). Members of the public are invited to attend at either location. A time for public comment is provided at the conclusion of each agenda item and at the conclusion of each Board meeting. There is a time limit of three minutes per speaker. Members of the community providing testimony must fill out a visitor card, available on-site the day of the meeting.

Alternatively, public comment may be submitted in writing at publiccomment@spcsa.nv.gov, and any such public comment received prior to the meeting will be provided to the Authority and included in the written minutes of the meeting.

Click here for a list of all SPCSA Members.

Click here for a list of all SPCSA sponsored schools.


Friday, October 2, 2020

State Public Charter School Authority Board Meeting

Click here to see the meeting agenda

What happened at this meeting? 

Members of the public submitted comment online and over the phone regarding: 

  • Reopening schools for in-person instruction
  • Concerns about reopening guidance
  • Appreciation of the Authority for keeping school leaders apprised of information about school ratings

Click here to view Public Comment #1
Click here to view Public Comment #2
Click here to view Public Comment #3
Click here to view Public Comment #4
Click here to view Public Comment #5 

SPCSA Executive Director’s Report: 

Report Highlights: 

  • Response to COVID-19 Pandemic & Reopening of Schools
    • Director Feiden provided a recap on the SPCSA COVID-19 In Person Learning Guidance. In the guidance document, Baseline Level means a county is subject to the default mitigation efforts established across the state. A county will move into Mitigation Levels 1 or 2 if there are two or more consecutive weeks of elevated COVID transmissions. When a county moves into Mitigation Levels 1 or 2, the county must conduct a local risk assessment and action plan and provide them to the COVID19 Response Task Force. A county may be removed from Task Force supervision and move back down to Baseline Level when transmission has declined. The Road to Recovery document allows for other mitigation efforts to be put in place more quickly. 

Click here to view the SPCSA COVID-19 update.
Click here to view the SPCSA COVID-19 In-Person Learning Guidance.
Click here to view the Road to Recovery.

  • Authority Guidelines:
    • At Baseline Level, schools can choose to operate in person. At Mitigation Levels 1 or 2, schools must operate primarily distance and limit in person learning to 25%. Exemptions are provided to Washoe and Churchill–schools in these counties can operate beyond the 25% threshold, but no higher than 40%. No schools in Clark County have exemptions in place with many beginning to move from distance to 25% in person learning. Currently, 19 of 55 campuses in Clark County are providing in person instruction. The Authority will continue to monitor implementation and may consider additional exemptions. 
    • In a memo, Director Feiden noted that SPCSA has been tracking the number of cases in SPCSA-sponsored schools. At the point when the memo was drafted, SPCSA had been notified of 36 students or staff cases–that number is now up to 38. The students or staff that have contracted COVID had not had substantial contact with members of the community due to distance learning. Over the next month, the Authority will monitor mitigation Task Force data, continue to review weekly updates, and look closely at SPCSA data and data coming in across the county regarding cases in schools.

      Click here to read more about this in the Las Vegas Review Journal.
  • Connectivity and Devices: 
    • Currently, of students attending SPCSA sponsored schools, 154 students are without internet and 1,500 students need devices. The SPCSA is also working with Cox Communications to provide students in Clark County access to internet. SPCSA staff will provide additional information to schools next week. Click here to read the full update.
  • Update on Serving All Students Equitably
    • Changes to site evaluations approved at the August 28th board meeting have been implemented with early positive signs including increased diversity and representation of school site evaluation focus groups. Moving forward, SPCSA will continue to examine closing opportunity gaps by analyzing subgroup data as well as supports for schools who serve students experiencing homelessness or are systems-involved.
  • Updates to Academic Performance Framework and Nevada School Performance Framework
    • Aligned to the waiver that lifts state requirements to assign Star Ratings to schools in Nevada, the SPCSA will provide schools with partial SPCSA Academic Performance Framework results. In order to assess new school applications and requests for amendments, the SPCSA will consider a range of other data sources, including prior data for most schools, organizational and financial performance data, ACT results, graduation rates, and CTE participation. Click here to read the Monitoring Academic Performance memo.
  • Grant Monitoring Protocol
    • The SPCSA has the authority and responsibility to monitor its schools for federal grant compliance, as stated in 2 CFR § 200.331(b) as well as state grant compliance for those grants passed through the SPCSA. The SPCSA is seeking to evaluate the risk of SPCSA-sponsored subgrantees (schools) and how that approach will be monitored. SPCSA will hold an upcoming training with schools to conduct a risk assessment component which will help to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

Click here to read the Federal and Grant Risk Assessment Protocol.
Click here to read Federal Grant and Monitoring Activities.

  • Regulations Regarding Online Charter Schools (SB441)
    • Senate Bill 441, passed during the 2019 Legislative Session provides for the Department of Education to create regulations related to the operation of online-only charter schools. The SPCSA hosted stakeholder convenings to gather input on regulations. Feedback varied and is compiled in a memo to Superintendent Jhone Ebert. Moving forward, the Department of Education will schedule regulatory hearing. The SPCSA will continue to work with stakeholders to provide input. 

Click here to Read the Senate Bill 441 Update Memo.

Board Heard Update from Schools Actions to Address Inequity

SPCSA board members heard from school leaders at Beacon Academy and Equipo Academy on efforts made to address equity, systemic racism, and/or the implementation of restorative justice practices.

Beacon Academy executive staff shared equity-related information on their school model:

  • Beacon recruits and hires team members who relate well with the student population and their families and guardians. Beacon staff is provided with extensive professional development, including Trauma Informed Instruction. Retention incentives are provided to keep staff trained to work with the student population.
  • Beacon provides for classroom considerations, ensuring students will be comfortable in the classroom to address student anxiety. Teachers are informed of any student anxieties in advance of the first day of school.
  • Beacon staff is trained in customer service skills and the enrollment team is bilingual in Spanish and English. Beacon does not enforce “Zero Tolerance” policies and instead works with students about making better choices and decisions. If a student is withdrawn from Beacon, staff reach out in any way to re-engage the student. Efforts outlined above are repeated, but with additional interventions. Beacon operates from a perspective of helping. 
  • Beacon invites service providers to come to the school and to meet with students at the school in person. Community agencies can bridge the gap between what a school can do and what the students need. Beacon tries to ensure that available providers are in the community the student lives in within walking distance.

Click here to download Beacon Academy’s presentation.

Equipo Academy Founder and Principal Ben Salkowe shared the three initial equity priorities Equipo’s board facilitated, including:

  • Making a statement that Black lives matter as a team and organization which was released as a Google doc others could sign–the statement was signed by several dozen student organizations, academic organizations, and PLCs.
  • Backing up Equipo’s belief that Black lives matter, noting that even though Equipo is a school that has a restorative justice program and doesn’t support “Zero Tolerance” policies, there were still direct and indirect ways Equipo had opportunities to improve. Equipo looked at their enrollment data and discovered they serve proportionately less Black students than other nearby high schools. 
  • Equipo will be conducting an external audit related to the equity, access, and inclusivity of Equipo Academy. Equipo has partnered with Promise54 who will conduct a review of organizational documents as well as interview staff and families. Additionally, Promise54 will work with Equipo to create a vision document and policies & procedures that support inclusivity. The findings will be shared with the community at Equipo’s annual meeting and progress towards identified gaps will be communicated in an ongoing manner. 

Board Heard Update on CIVICA Nevada College and Career Academy

SPCSA staff and representatives of CIVICA provided updates regarding the status of the conditions attached to CIVICA Nevada Career and Collegiate Academy. CIVICA has completed or near completed three conditions and anticipate the remainder to be completed no later than January 2021. CIVICA school representatives also shared updates on their Leadership Academic and Mentoring program, facilities, marketing communications, and upcoming events.

Click here to download CIVICA’s presentation.

Board Heard Update on Schools Under Receivership or Previously Under Receivership 

SPCSA heard updates on Quest Academy and Argent Preparatory Academy from SPCSA staff and the appointed receiver for both schools.

Question Preparatory Academy:

Quest Preparatory Academy conducted its first meeting of the Quest Preparatory Academy Board on September 24, 2020. All five board members were in attendance. A second meeting will take place on October 6. Draft bylaws have been prepared for the board’s consideration to outline committee structures and election of officers as well as other governance structures, operations issues, and the school’s academic performance and financial position. Quest is on track to launch its governing board on or around Oct 15. 

Argent Preparatory Academy:

The Argent building purchase has been extended two months. The contract extension adds additional fees for the purchases, bringing the total contract purchase to over $2.3 million and bringing an additional $30,000 into Argent. Additional funds are also in escrow.

Board Heard Update on Nevada Connections Academy 

Nevada Connections Academy (NCA) executive staff shared updates on beginning school year progress and efforts to improve student outcomes and the school’s star rating. NCA plans to set forth targets related to English Language Learner (ELL) proficiency. The current graduation rate is over 80%, to be confirmed by the Nevada Department of Education in December. NCA will increase focus on preparing and monitoring student academic achievement and growth, and on addressing students’ needs with accountability, assessment completion, and interventions to help students reach success.

Click here to download the presentation. 

Board Heard Overview of New School Application Process

The Authority heard a presentation from SPCSA staff on the new school application process. The presentation outlined the current six-step application process: 

  • Letter of Intent
  • Application
  • Completeness Check
  • Application Review
  • Capacity Interview
  • Recommendation to the Board

SPCSA staff noted that the Academic and Demographic Needs Assessment mandated under Assembly Bill 462 (2019) added a layer to the evaluation process where schools are unlikely to be approved if they do not meet these needs. Noteworthy changes of the new school application process include:

  • A revised and updated rubric to eliminate redundancies and streamline processes;
  • Addition of a scenario-based exercise to assess the capacity of each school’s governing board; and
  • A modified financial plan workbook to request additional information and address assumptions.

Click here to download the presentation.

Board Heard Presentation on the Organizational Performance Framework

The SPCSA Organizational Performance Framework (OPF) sets forth agreed upon expectations of performance and compliance. The OPF enables the SPCSA to:

  • Fulfill its mission as authorizer and regulator. 
  • Fulfill NRS 388A.273 requirements for performance indicators, measures, and metrics for the organization category.
  • Fulfill public school obligations and provide transparent reporting.
  • Convey SPCSA expectations of charter schools.
  • Streamline work for staff and schools.

SPCSA monitors processes required by statute more closely under this framework, including lottery practices, board governance, and ELL programs. SPCSA staff plans to bring recommendations on this framework at the Nov. 6 meeting.

Click here to download the presentation.

Long-Range Calendar

Due to the volume of anticipated agenda items, an additional SPCSA meeting will be scheduled in December.

Click here to see the long-range calendar.


Sign up to receive a notification when a new Ed-Watch post is published: